For the first time since the Great Depression, more people are leaving the United States than arriving — and it's not just deportees
Executive Summary
- The United States experienced net negative migration of approximately 150,000 people in 2025 — the first such reversal in roughly 90 years, since the Great Depression era
- At least 180,000 American citizens relocated to just 15 tracked countries last year, driven by affordability arbitrage, safety concerns, and remote work capabilities
- The phenomenon — dubbed the "Donald Dash" — represents a structural shift that threatens to hollow out the middle class, reshape real estate markets, and undermine the foundational narrative of American exceptionalism
Chapter 1: The Numbers Behind the Reversal
In its 250th year, America is experiencing something that hasn't occurred since bread lines snaked through Lower Manhattan: more people are leaving than arriving.
According to the Brookings Institution, the United States saw net negative migration of roughly 150,000 people in 2025. Total in-migration dropped to between 2.6 and 2.7 million, down from a peak of nearly 6 million in 2023. On the outflow side, the Department of Homeland Security reported 675,000 formal deportations and 2.2 million "self-deportations" — a category that encompasses both undocumented immigrants leaving voluntarily and legal residents choosing not to return.
But buried beneath the administration's triumphant deportation statistics lies a far less celebrated trend: American citizens themselves are leaving in record numbers.
A Wall Street Journal analysis of data from 15 countries providing full or partial 2025 statistics found that at least 180,000 Americans obtained residence permits abroad last year. Given that this covers barely a quarter of the world's nations, the true global figure is almost certainly far higher. The State Department estimates approximately 9 million American civilians live overseas — a number that has grown steadily since the early 2000s but appears to have accelerated sharply since 2023.
| Metric | Figure | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Net migration (2025) | -150,000 | First negative since ~1935 |
| American citizens relocated (15 countries) | 180,000+ | WSJ partial count |
| US deportations (2025) | 675,000 | DHS official data |
| Self-deportations (2025) | 2,200,000 | DHS estimate |
| Americans living abroad (est.) | ~9 million | State Dept. estimate |
| Peak in-migration (2023) | ~6 million | Brookings data |
| In-migration (2025) | 2.6-2.7M | 55% decline from peak |
The Brookings Institution projects the outflow will increase further in 2026.
Chapter 2: Anatomy of the Exodus
The Dollar Arbitrage
The primary driver is brutally simple economics. With the median U.S. home price exceeding $420,000 and the average monthly rent in major metros surpassing $2,000, American incomes — particularly for remote workers — stretch dramatically further abroad. A software engineer earning $120,000 in Lisbon or Medellín can afford a lifestyle that would require $300,000 or more in San Francisco or New York.
The numbers from destination countries tell the story:
- Portugal: The number of American residents has increased 500% since the pandemic, with a 36% spike in 2024 alone. In Lisbon, so many Americans have arrived that newcomers complain of hearing more English than Portuguese.
- Spain and the Netherlands: American residents have roughly doubled in the past decade.
- Ireland: Twice as many U.S. citizens moved there in 2025 compared to 2024. One in 15 residents in Dublin's Grand Canal Dock district was born in the United States — a higher American-born density than Ireland's Irish-born concentration during the 19th-century Potato Famine emigration.
- Germany: For the first time, more Americans moved to Germany than Germans moved to America.
- Czech Republic: American residents have approximately doubled over the past decade.
The Safety Factor
Beyond economics, safety has emerged as a powerful motivator. "You don't face the prospect of your 5-year-old going into a kindergarten and doing an active shooter drill," explained Chris Ford, a 41-year-old who works for a Dallas-based company while living in Berlin.
With 982 confirmed measles cases in the first seven weeks of 2026 — more than in all of 2024 — and the United States at risk of losing its measles elimination status, public health anxieties now compound the traditional gun violence concerns that have long motivated American emigrants.
The Remote Work Revolution
The pandemic-era normalization of remote work has removed the single greatest barrier to emigration: the need to be physically present for employment. Companies like Expatsi, a relocation firm founded by a 54-year-old Alabama native now based in Mexico's Yucatán, illustrate the scale of demand. In 2024, the company organized three group scouting trips; in 2026, it will run 57. Its stated goal: to help one million Americans move abroad.
"Previously, the Americans leaving were super-adventurous and well-credentialed," said founder Jen Barnett. "Now they're ordinary people, like me."
Countries are responding with targeted visa programs. Albania — the former Stalinist state — now offers a special visa allowing U.S. citizens to live and work there with no tax on foreign income for a year. A recent Expatsi conference call about Albania attracted nearly 400 sign-ups. Portugal, Spain, Greece, and multiple Southeast Asian nations have created "digital nomad" visas specifically designed to attract remote workers.
Chapter 3: The Historical Parallel — Depression-Era Emigration
The last time America experienced net negative migration was during the Great Depression of the 1930s. The parallels, while imperfect, are instructive.
| Factor | 1930s | 2025-2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Primary driver | Economic collapse, 25% unemployment | Affordability crisis, safety concerns |
| Who left | Mexican repatriates (forced), economic migrants (voluntary) | Deportees + voluntary citizen emigrants |
| Destination | Mexico, home countries | Europe, Latin America, Southeast Asia |
| Return of nativism | Immigration Act of 1924 | IEEPA crackdown, mass deportation program |
| Institutional confidence | Collapsed (bank runs, Hoovervilles) | Declining (36% presidential approval, DHS shutdown) |
| Key difference | Citizens didn't leave in large numbers | Citizens are a significant component of outflow |
The critical distinction: in the 1930s, the outflow was overwhelmingly driven by the repatriation of Mexican migrants, many of them U.S. citizens or legal residents forcibly removed. Today's exodus includes a significant voluntary component of middle-class Americans choosing departure — a phenomenon without clear historical precedent in modern American history.
Chapter 4: The Immigration Paradox
The Trump administration has framed net negative migration as a policy success. "The U.S. economy is far outpacing other developed nations," a White House spokesman told the Wall Street Journal, noting that the administration was attracting "countless ultra-high net worth foreigners" spending $1 million for a Gold Card visa.
This reveals a structural paradox at the heart of American immigration policy: the simultaneous expulsion of low-wage workers who sustain agriculture, construction, and service industries, while recruiting wealthy foreigners who contribute capital but not labor — all while middle-class citizens with portable skills quietly depart.
The math is unfavorable. The 2.875 million deportations in 2025 removed workers from sectors already experiencing acute labor shortages. The Bureau of Labor Statistics — to the extent its data remains reliable after the 862,000-job revision — shows agricultural, construction, and hospitality sectors facing chronic unfilled positions. Meanwhile, the departing American citizens tend to be precisely the high-productivity knowledge workers the economy needs: remote tech workers, entrepreneurs, and professionals.
The Gold Card program, designed to attract high-net-worth immigrants at $1 million per applicant, operates on an entirely different scale. Even if it attracts 10,000 applicants annually — an optimistic projection — it replaces neither the labor lost through deportation nor the productivity lost through citizen emigration.
Chapter 5: Scenario Analysis
Scenario A: The Trickle Becomes a Stream (45%)
Probability basis: Historical precedent shows migration trends accelerate once networks are established (chain migration theory). The infrastructure for American emigration — relocation firms, digital nomad visa programs, online communities — is expanding rapidly.
Trigger conditions:
- Remote work policies remain permissive
- US housing affordability continues to deteriorate
- DHS shutdown and institutional dysfunction persist
- More countries create American-targeted visa programs
Outcome: Annual American citizen emigration reaches 300,000-500,000 by 2028. Net negative migration becomes a structural feature. The "American diaspora" emerges as a recognized demographic phenomenon. Destination countries experience housing pressure and gentrification backlash (already visible in Lisbon, Bali, and Medellín).
Scenario B: Policy Correction Slows the Outflow (30%)
Probability basis: The 2026 midterm elections create political pressure to address affordability and institutional dysfunction. The "brain drain" narrative gains media traction.
Trigger conditions:
- Midterm elections shift Congressional balance
- Housing affordability legislation gains traction
- Section 122 tariffs expire or are moderated, reducing cost-of-living pressure
- Institutional functions (DHS, NWS, FEMA) are restored
Outcome: Emigration stabilizes at 2025 levels but doesn't reverse. The structural appeal of geographic arbitrage persists for remote workers. America retains its immigrant attraction while hemorrhaging a smaller number of citizens.
Scenario C: Acceleration Through Crisis (25%)
Probability basis: The convergence of multiple ongoing crises — Iran military escalation, DHS shutdown, measles epidemic, AI job displacement — creates a "tipping point" psychology.
Trigger conditions:
- Military conflict with Iran raises domestic security concerns
- AI-driven white-collar unemployment accelerates
- Healthcare system deterioration becomes acute
- SCOTUS IEEPA aftermath creates prolonged economic uncertainty
Historical precedent: The 1970s "stagflation era" saw elevated emigration among professionals, though comprehensive data is limited. Post-2003 Iraq War era saw increased American relocation to Canada and Europe, though at smaller scale.
Outcome: Emigration accelerates to 500,000+ annually. Citizenship renunciations — already running at approximately 12,000 per year — spike dramatically. The IRS exit tax ($910,000 exclusion for 2026) becomes a significant revenue item. Destination countries tighten immigration policies to manage American inflows.
Chapter 6: Investment Implications
Real Estate
Destination markets (bullish): European residential real estate in Lisbon, Dublin, Madrid, Prague, and Berlin faces continued demand pressure from dollar-denominated buyers. Southeast Asian markets (Thailand, Bali, Vietnam) similarly benefit, though regulatory pushback is mounting.
US housing (mixed): The departure of middle-to-upper-middle-class renters and buyers from high-cost metros could marginally ease pressure in coastal cities, but the effect is dwarfed by the structural supply deficit. The more significant impact is on the luxury segment in cities like Austin, Miami, and San Francisco, where departures concentrate.
Labor Markets
US tech sector: The loss of remote-capable knowledge workers exacerbates the tension between AI automation and human talent. Companies that embrace global remote workforces benefit; those requiring physical presence face talent shortages.
Destination country economies: American remote workers inject US-dollar purchasing power into local economies, but the gentrification effect creates political backlash. Portugal's recent restrictions on golden visas and short-term rentals illustrate the regulatory response pattern.
Currency
The structural flow of US dollars into European and emerging market economies provides marginal support for destination currencies. However, the volumes remain small relative to capital market flows. The more significant channel is psychological: American emigration undermines the "American exceptionalism" narrative that underpins dollar reserve status.
Consumer Spending
With departing Americans typically in the 25-55 demographic sweet spot for consumption, each emigrant represents approximately $40,000-$80,000 in annual domestic consumer spending lost. At 200,000 emigrants annually, this implies a $8-16 billion annual reduction in domestic consumption — small relative to the $19 trillion consumer economy, but concentrated in specific sectors (housing, healthcare, education) and geographies.
Conclusion
The American Exodus represents something more profound than a demographic curiosity. For 250 years, the United States defined itself as the destination — the place people came to, not left from. The reversal of that narrative, even if the absolute numbers remain modest relative to the population of 340 million, strikes at the foundation of American identity.
The White House frames the net negative migration as a deportation success story. But when a 41-year-old Texan chooses Berlin over Dallas for his child's safety, when 400 Americans scramble to learn how to move to Albania, when one in 15 residents of Dublin's trendiest neighborhood was born in America — the story becomes something else entirely.
It becomes a referendum on the American social contract: the implicit promise that hard work, education, and ambition will be rewarded with safety, prosperity, and opportunity. When that contract is perceived to have been broken — by unaffordable housing, by school shooting drills, by institutional dysfunction, by a political system that feels beyond repair — people don't protest. They pack.
The question for investors, policymakers, and citizens alike is whether this is a temporary aberration or the beginning of a structural shift. The Great Depression-era emigration eventually reversed as the economy recovered and war approached. But today's emigration is driven not by cyclical economic distress but by structural quality-of-life calculations enabled by technology and globalization — forces that show no signs of abating.
For the first time since the 1930s, the American Dream has an exit clause. And more people than ever are reading the fine print.
Sources: Wall Street Journal, Brookings Institution, DHS, NBC News, Expatsi, Bureau of Labor Statistics
Leave a Reply