The EDSA Paradox: When the Dictator's Son Becomes President

40 years after People Power toppled Ferdinand Marcos Sr., the Philippines faces its most bitter irony — and its most consequential democratic test

Executive Summary

The Philippines marks the 40th anniversary of the 1986 EDSA People Power Revolution on February 25, 2026 — with Ferdinand Marcos Jr., son of the ousted dictator, occupying the presidential palace his father was expelled from.
A massive anti-corruption movement — the "Trillion Peso March" — has erupted since September 2025, fueled by a flood control projects scandal worth an estimated ₱1 trillion ($17.5 billion), triggering the highest-level government shakeup since EDSA itself.
The Philippines' democratic paradox — a dynasty restored through the very democratic institutions built to prevent its return — offers a cautionary tale for every democracy struggling with populism, historical revisionism, and institutional decay.

Chapter 1: The Revolution That Ate Itself

On February 25, 1986, millions of Filipinos poured onto Epifanio de los Santos Avenue (EDSA) in Metro Manila. Nuns knelt before tanks. Civilians formed human chains. Within four days, the 20-year dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos Sr. — a regime that had plundered an estimated $5–10 billion from state coffers, imposed martial law, tortured political opponents, and hollowed out democratic institutions — collapsed without a shot being fired.

People Power became the template for non-violent revolution worldwide. It inspired the fall of authoritarian regimes from South Korea (1987) to Eastern Europe (1989). The Philippines wrote a new constitution in 1987 with explicit protections against the return of dictatorship: term limits, an independent judiciary, a free press, and a Commission on Human Rights.

Forty years later, the son of Ferdinand Marcos Sr. sits in Malacañang Palace. Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. won the 2022 presidential election with 31.6 million votes — the largest margin in Philippine democratic history. His running mate was Sara Duterte, daughter of Rodrigo Duterte, the strongman president who waged a drug war that killed an estimated 6,000–30,000 people and now faces trial at the International Criminal Court.

The revolution's betrayal is not merely symbolic. It is structural.

Chapter 2: The Trillion Peso Storm

Since September 2025, the Philippines has been rocked by what may be the largest anti-corruption movement since EDSA itself. The trigger: a flood control projects scandal involving the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) worth an estimated ₱1 trillion ($17.5 billion) — money allegedly funneled through ghost projects, overpriced contracts, and kickbacks that reached into the Philippine Congress and the executive branch.

The first "Trillion Peso March" on September 21, 2025, drew over 100,000 protesters to EDSA and Rizal Park — the largest demonstrations the Philippines had seen in years. Students walked out of universities. Church leaders joined. Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) held solidarity rallies from Dubai to Hong Kong.

The political fallout has been extraordinary:

Casualty	Position	Outcome
Martin Romualdez	House Speaker (Marcos cousin)	Resigned
Chiz Escudero	Senate President	Removed
Jinggoy Estrada	Senate President pro tempore	Removed
Lucas Bersamin	Executive Secretary	Resigned
Amenah Pangandaman	Budget Secretary	Resigned
Zaldy Co, Edvic Yap	House Representatives	Resigned
Mass resignations	DPWH officials	Ongoing

Yet Marcos Jr. himself remains in office. His approval ratings have cratered, but the constitutional mechanisms for removal — impeachment by a two-thirds congressional supermajority — remain politically unfeasible given his party's residual hold on the legislature.

Today, February 25, the 40th anniversary sees two separate but overlapping protests on EDSA. The Trillion Peso March Movement, led by Francis Dee — grandson of assassinated democracy icon Benigno Aquino Jr. — focuses on anti-corruption legislation and an anti-dynasty law. Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan), a leftist coalition, goes further: demanding the resignation of both Marcos Jr. and Vice President Sara Duterte. The armed forces are on red alert.

Chapter 3: The Dynasty Machine

The Philippines' democratic paradox cannot be understood without grasping the structural power of political dynasties — the very phenomenon EDSA was supposed to end.

The scale is staggering. According to the Asian Institute of Management, approximately 70% of Philippine congressional seats are held by members of political dynasties. In some provinces, a single family has controlled local government for generations. The 1987 Constitution explicitly called for an anti-dynasty law — Article II, Section 26 states: "The State shall guarantee equal access to opportunities for public service, and prohibit political dynasties as may be defined by law." Thirty-nine years later, Congress has never passed implementing legislation.

The Marcos family's return illustrates the mechanism:

Step 1: Exile and wealth preservation — After fleeing in 1986, the Marcos family retained estimated billions in overseas accounts and real estate, despite government recovery efforts. The Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) recovered only an estimated $4 billion of the plundered wealth.
Step 2: Return and rehabilitation — Imelda Marcos won a congressional seat in 1995. Her children entered politics in their family's stronghold of Ilocos Norte. Bongbong became governor, then senator.
Step 3: Historical revisionism — Beginning in the early 2010s, a sophisticated social media campaign reframed the Marcos dictatorship as a "golden age" of Philippine development. YouTube videos glorifying the era accumulated millions of views. The 2016 burial of Marcos Sr. at the Heroes' Cemetery, authorized by President Duterte, provided official legitimation.
Step 4: Electoral victory — By 2022, polls showed that a plurality of Filipino voters under 35 believed the Marcos era was a period of prosperity. Bongbong won in a landslide.

The parallel with global democratic backsliding is unmistakable. From Hungary's Orbán to Turkey's Erdoğan to India's Modi, the pattern recurs: democratic institutions are used to concentrate power, historical narratives are rewritten through social media, and a veneer of electoral legitimacy masks the erosion of accountability.

Chapter 4: The Marcos-Duterte Divorce

The alliance that brought Marcos Jr. to power is now its most destabilizing fault line.

The Marcos-Duterte ticket in 2022 was a marriage of convenience: Marcos brought the Luzon vote and nostalgia politics; Duterte brought Mindanao and the law-and-order base. By 2024, the alliance had fractured. Sara Duterte publicly threatened to exhume Marcos Sr.'s body from the Heroes' Cemetery. She was stripped of her Cabinet positions. By late 2025, she had announced her intention to run for president in 2028.

The Duterte faction now operates as a parallel opposition. In the current anti-corruption protests, pro-Duterte groups march separately, calling for Marcos's resignation — not out of democratic principle, but to create space for Sara's return. This produces the surreal spectacle of EDSA's 40th anniversary being marked by three distinct camps:

Progressive/anti-corruption movement — Demands systemic reform, anti-dynasty legislation, accountability
Duterte bloc — Demands Marcos's ouster, positions Sara as alternative
Marcos government — Celebrates EDSA as a national holiday while embodying its antithesis

The ICC's ongoing prosecution of Rodrigo Duterte — with hearings on February 23–27, 2026, on charges of crimes against humanity related to the drug war — adds another volatile dimension. If convicted, the Duterte political brand could be permanently tainted, or it could galvanize his base through a martyrdom narrative.

Chapter 5: Scenario Analysis — The Philippines to 2028

Scenario A: Managed Stagnation (45%)

Premise: Marcos Jr. survives to 2028 by sacrificing allies while protecting the presidency.

Evidence:

The resignation cascade (Speaker, Senate President, Cabinet secretaries) has functioned as a political pressure valve, allowing Marcos to distance himself from the scandal's worst optics
Historical precedent: President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo survived the "Hello Garci" election fraud scandal (2005) and a similar corruption uproar, serving out her term through a combination of congressional loyalty and military backing
The Philippine economy, while slowing, is projected to grow 5.2% in 2026 (Unicapital), supported by OFW remittances ($36B+/year) and BPO revenues

Trigger conditions: No new mega-scandal; military neutrality; OFW remittance flows steady; global economy avoids recession.

Investment implications: Philippine peso stability; moderate PSEi recovery; infrastructure spending pickup in 2027 as government accelerates pre-election projects.

Scenario B: Constitutional Crisis (30%)

Premise: Anti-corruption movement escalates, forcing an impeachment attempt or extra-constitutional removal.

Evidence:

The "Baha sa Luneta" protests in September 2025 saw the largest crowds since 2001, when People Power II ousted President Joseph Estrada
Philippine political transitions have historically been triggered by military defection (1986, 2001), and the armed forces' "red alert" status for today's anniversary signals institutional anxiety
Debt-to-GDP is projected to hit 65.7% in 2026 — a 20-year high — constraining the government's ability to "buy" political support through spending

Trigger conditions: New scandal implicating Marcos family directly; military signals withdrawal of support; economic downturn (6%+ inflation or sub-4% GDP growth); street mobilization exceeding 500,000.

Historical precedent: In 2001, Vice President Gloria Arroyo replaced President Estrada after a Senate impeachment trial collapsed and the military withdrew support. The process took 4 months from crisis to transition.

Investment implications: Capital flight; PSEi 15-20% correction; peso depreciation to ₱62-65/USD; OFW remittance premium; political risk repricing across emerging markets.

Scenario C: Duterte Restoration (25%)

Premise: Sara Duterte leverages the crisis to position herself as the 2028 frontrunner, potentially forcing an early transition.

Evidence:

Sara Duterte's approval ratings have rebounded to the mid-40s, significantly above Marcos Jr.
The Duterte political machine retains strong support in Mindanao (30% of the population) and among the police/military establishment
A populist "outsider" narrative — ironic given the dynasty — could channel anti-corruption anger

Trigger conditions: ICC proceedings damage Rodrigo but not Sara's brand; Marcos allies defect; economic populism (cash transfers, drug war revival rhetoric) resonates; 2028 election dynamics consolidate anti-Marcos vote around Sara.

Risk: A Duterte restoration could trigger a new ICC confrontation, as Sara has publicly defended her father's drug war. It would also represent the ultimate irony — the EDSA revolution's institutions being used to cycle between two authoritarian dynasties.

Chapter 6: Investment Implications and the Regional Lens

The Philippines' democratic turbulence matters beyond Manila. The country is a critical node in the US-China competition for Southeast Asia. It hosts the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) bases — America's closest military footprint to Taiwan and the South China Sea. Political instability could affect:

EDCA base access — Both Marcos and Duterte factions have used the US alliance as a political football. A Duterte restoration could reprise Rodrigo's 2016 pivot toward China.
BPO industry ($32B revenue, 1.7M workers) — Political uncertainty could accelerate India's competitive gains in outsourcing.
Nickel and copper mining — The Philippines is the world's second-largest nickel producer. Regulatory instability affects supply chains critical to EV batteries and AI infrastructure.

The broader lesson: The EDSA paradox — a democracy's own mechanisms enabling the return of the very forces it was designed to prevent — is not unique to the Philippines. It echoes in Hungary (Orbán's constitutional capture), Turkey (Erdoğan's referendum), and potentially in the United States (the debate over executive power post-IEEPA ruling). Democratic institutions are only as strong as the collective memory that sustains them. When that memory is erased through social media manipulation and generational turnover, the safeguards crumble from within.

Conclusion

Forty years ago today, the world watched in awe as Filipinos proved that people power could topple a dictator without violence. The EDSA revolution was not just a Philippine story — it was a human story about the possibility of peaceful democratic change.

Today, the son of that dictator governs the nation, anti-corruption protesters fill the same avenue, and the country's democratic institutions strain under the weight of dynastic politics, historical amnesia, and structural corruption. The armed forces are on alert. The ICC is prosecuting a former president. Two rival dynasties — Marcos and Duterte — compete for control of the republic.

The EDSA paradox asks the hardest question a democracy can face: What happens when the people freely choose to forget?

Sources: Rappler, Gulf News, Philstar, Wikipedia (2025-2026 Philippine Anti-Corruption Protests), Manila Bulletin, AP News, Unicapital Research, Asian Institute of Management

Eco Stream